Week 7 Reflective Journal Entry
Applying
Reflection and Critical Thinking to Address Dilemmas of Mental health care
Introduction
The practice of mental health care ethics
and professional dilemmas is quite common where the practitioner is faced with
the conflict between respecting autonomy and the obligation of protecting
vulnerable individuals. Rational thinking and cogitation is an important
ingredient in making judgments that impact on safety, dignity and wellbeing. In
this entry, I will refer to a case scenario of a mental health service user
that refused medication even after being evidenced to act in a way that is
dangerous to themselves and others. By applying Gibbs’ Reflective Cycle and
critical thinking principles, I will explore how reflection can guide ethical
problem-solving in mental health contexts (Peabody
et al., 2022).
The
Dilemma
On my
time on placement at a mental health facility, I assisted an adult service user
with a diagnosis of schizophrenia. The patient denied taking antipsychotic
drugs as they were not needed and were harmful. This presented a conflict
between the right of the person to make decisions on refusal of treatment,
which is his right to autonomy, and the need to protect the person and not
cause harm to others since the untreated psychosis may cause a relapse or a
crisis. The case caused ethical conflict between encouraging independence and
professional safeguarding and duty of care in accordance with the Mental Health
Act (2007).
Applying
Reflection (Gibbs’ Reflective Cycle)
Description & Feelings: I was ambivalent at
the moment. I knew that the service user was worried about the side effects,
but I also found it worrying the dangers of non-compliance. I got nervous as to
how framing treatment as a positive process would dissolve trust, but I was also
afraid not to take action.
Evaluation: I have recognised
how merely respecting the refusal without any further action can pose a threat
to the wellbeing of the service user. According to when the therapeutic
relationship may be compromised, autonomy may be infringed by attempting to
force treatment.
Analysis: I used Gibbs
framework to analyse professional codes of practice, legal advice, and the
contribution of my supervisor. The reflection assisted me in appreciating that
an open dialog with the service user was very necessary-answering any concerns
the patient had, discussing possible risks and considering other options. The
less restrictive alternative should be the first choice when it comes to mental
health care as cited to be the guiding principles of the Mental Health
Act.
Action Plan: This reflexion
underpins the necessity of anticipating the refusal of medication. What I can
do in future practice is develop a more solid communication skill that will
facilitate a shared-decision making and providing the best information on
services to the service users so that they can make informed choices. I will
also expand my knowledge of the mental health law to be able to balance
autonomy and protection with confidence.
Applying Critical Thinking
Critical thinking enabled me to evaluate the
situation beyond immediate emotional responses. I considered three possible
courses of action:
·
Respect refusal entirely: Upholds autonomy but risks relapse and
harm.
·
Enforce treatment using Mental Health Act: Not only ensures safety
but also might induce trauma and mistrust.
·
Handling autonomy and protection through discussion and
seeking options (e.g., treatment, dose adjustment): Allows maximizing
presence of defense without discouraging independence as much as
possible.
·
The
process of questioning suppositions (i.e., that refusal of medication is a risk
per se) and effectively taking into consideration ethical, legal, and practical
consequences led me to the conclusion that the third approach is the most
adequate one. Aryal (2022) also helped to inform my decision: by reflecting on
my experiences as a student and comparing them to the experiences of the
service user, I realized I felt uncomfortable; by reflecting on my experience
as a colleague and discussing the issue with my supervisor, I considered the
fears of the service user; and by considering the findings of scholars and
medical professionals and reading research and policies advancing the principle
of collaborative care in mental health treatment, I analysed the advantages of
collaboration in mental health care.
Conclusion
The
dilemma demonstrated how complex a task such as decision-making in mental
health care is. Reflection enabled me to comprehend my feelings and
work-related roles, and critical thinking made sure that I considered various
approaches and solutions. I understood that respecting autonomy does not imply
neglecting a danger, and safeguarding must get established in balancing with
therapeutic communication. In the future, I will incorporate reflective models
and critical frameworks of thought into my practice to help reinforce legal,
ethical, and compassionate mental health work.
References
·
Peabody, M.A., Noyes, S. and Anderson, M., 2022. Permission to
learn: Intentional use of art and object-mediated strategies to develop
reflective professional skills. Journal of Occupational Therapy Education, 6(3),
p.14.
·
Simpson, M., 2024. Changing gears and buying time: a study
exploring AMHP practice following referral for a Mental Health Act assessment
in England and Wales. The British Journal of Social Work, 54(2),
pp.797-816.
·
Aryal, R., 2022, December. Critical self-reflective engagement
to improve professional development for a teacher educator. In Mathematics
Education Forum Chitwan (Vol. 7, No. 7, pp. 66-81).
Comments
Post a Comment